Renminbi likely to be included in SDR basket

On the 8th anniversary of the original Renminbi Bond Fund ("RBF"), the Chinese renminbi should finally receive the official global reserve status we have been patiently anticipating.

The number 8 in Chinese culture represents luck, fortune as well as “strong intuition and insight”. For us therefore it seems particularly fortuitous that Monday’s anticipated inclusion of the renminbi into the SDR arrives the same day as the 8th anniversary of our Renminbi Bond Fund.

Launched in 2007, before any other fund of its kind and well before the launch of the Dim Sum market itself, RBF aimed to create a sensible high grade asian bond product with exposure to the appreciation of the Chinese renminbi. The latter on the premise that this highly competitive superpower - accounting for their large reserves, current account and trade surpluses, inflationary pressures and welfare/prosperity aspirations - would pursue a lofty ambition of equal global reserve status with the US dollar.

For the best part of the past decade China has been clear in this ambition in both their rhetoric and accomplishments; working through roadmaps and IMF checklists systematically, not without the odd roadbump, but clear in their direction. SDR inclusion will be a major milestone and indeed a worthy accomplishment but certainly not the end of the road. Noting that during Japan’s industrialisation the yen appreciated 400% over 40 years from the early 70's even as its growth halved in each of those decades (see chart 3); one cannot simply conclude that the renminbi is out of steam simply because growth and exports have declined. The renminbi’s 23% appreciation over the past decade, since the dollar peg ended in 2005, still leaves it 4% weaker than the 5.8 level it stood at in 1993 before the forced devaluation (to 8.8) and four times the 1.6 level it was back in the early 80's (see chart 2). On a longer term view the currency still seems undervalued and under-owned.

1. Chinese renminbi onshore and offshore

Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg

2. Chinese renminbi and reserves pre and post US dollar peg

source: bloomberg

source: bloomberg

3. Chinese renminbi vs Japanese yen and growth over four decades



Since the inception of RBF in November 2007 the renminbi has appreciated 16% against the dollar despite recent dollar strength and investor misunderstandings about Chinese policy. This compares to currencies like the real, ruble and lira which are down 52-62% over the period. Many of the underlying factors that have driven the appreciation of the renminbi thus far are still ongoing. And with the current development it is possible to make some sensible forecasts for further medium term progress.

China’s weighting in anything from financial indices to corporate and central bank reserves has been constrained by capital controls which will continue to be relaxed. Currently we estimate that the Chinese renminbi only represents around 1% of global reserves. This is miniscule when compared to the 64% share of global reserves for the US dollar and 20% for the euro. Although much smaller than these two, sterling represents around 4% of global reserves with the Japanese yen accounting for around 3.5%. Given the importance of China in the world economy, central banks holdings of renminbi can only increase from here.  

The expected announcement on Monday of China’s entry into the exclusive SDR club, with a weight similar to that of the UK and Japan, will likely mean inflows of around USD 150 - 200bn from central banks (USD ~30bn directly to fulfil the SDR requirement), based current holdings of sterling and yen.

Our Expectations for the Announcement:

  • Inclusion of the renminbi as the 5th currency in the SDR1

  • Renminbi weighting of around 10% owing to a likely change in IMF staff calculations and recent statements from IMF staff. (see chart 4 - Back in 2012 we began forecasting that the renminbi would attain a 10.5% weighting in the forthcoming review) If they were to use existing methodology2  the figure would be closer to 14%.

  • Interest rate calculations will continue to be set weekly and the proposal to switch to daily will be postponed again. This will make it easier for China to comply with requirements as instruments for estimating interest rates are vital to maintaining the SDR basket. This association was made directly in an IMF paper in July.

4. Stratton Street’s SDR forecast from 2012

Source: stratton street capital llp calculations

Source: stratton street capital llp calculations

Transition and a Turning Point

Monday’s announcement should mark a turning point in Chinese domestic and market sentiment as China begins to reap the rewards of this difficult transitional year. As central bank assets begin to flow in, further capital inflows should be expected, placing ongoing pressure for continued renminbi appreciation. The SDR 204bn (which equates to USD282bn) in SDR reserves represents only around 2.5% of the USD11.5tn in total global foreign exchange reserves. Simultaneously, capital outflows should wane as a proportion of this was a short term consequence of easing regulations (i.e. funds that had been waiting to relocate rather than a substantial shift in domestic or global sentiment). Furthermore, Global, Asian and emerging indices, for both bonds and equities, will see increased weights with investors needing to continue to increase allocations to China as they remain vastly underweight given the importance of China in the global economy. Corporate entities and countries with significant business with China will increasingly follow the example of the SDR and retain some reserves in renminbi as trade settled in renminbi continues to increase.

The Chinese authorities are likely to respond to the increased demand by further increasing international investors' ability to access the domestic bond market. In what is likely to become a self reinforcing, virtuous circle,  the opening up of the bond market will boost the usage of renminbi and reserves in the currency could surpass the current combined allocation of sterling and yen before the next IMF SDR review in 2020. By that date the allocation to the renminbi in the SDR basket would likely have grown to 14% - 16%, in just five years.

Although investors are always faced with uncertainty, one thing is pretty certain; in the future investors will hold more renminbi and with short rates in China around 3%, early-adopters will likely reap the greatest rewards.  

1 In 2011 IMF, “agreed that the number of currencies in the basket should not be prejudged,but should remain relatively small as the SDR evolves.” The decision to reduce the basket from 16 to 5 in 1976 (implemented 1980) was based on (amongst other things) challenges to gauge interest rates for all the currencies - not a problem for existing SDR constituents. The underlying desire to have the SDR reflect global trade accurately and the recognition that the yen and sterling are of similar importance makes us believe that neither will be excluded on account of the renminbi’s inclusion. The SDR will then be representative of around two thirds of global GDP.

2 IMF states "artificial adjustment to the [currency] weight would constitute a fundamental change, thereby requiring an 85 percent voting majority" The historical decision to stick to the weighting methodology and not to scale back the dollar weighting when the basket was redefined in the 80s leaves us uncertain as to whether the same approach will be taken with the renminbi. Changing to the proposed methodology, which uses different metrics for assessing trade and financial importance, seems likely but is far from certain. With the renminbi considered viable it would leapfrog the sterling and yen well into the middle of the basket should the methodology not be revised.

Issued by Stratton Street Capital LLP which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. This document is for information only and does not constitute an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any investment, or subscribe to any investment management or advisory service. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the stated facts are accurate and opinions are fair and reasonable neither Stratton Street Capital LLP nor any of its partners or employees shall be responsible in any way for the contents of this document It is not, under any circumstances, intended for distribution to the general public. Distribution in the UK is restricted to those Investment Professionals defined under Articles 19 & 49 of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2001 & Articles 14 & 22 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Promotion of Collective Investment Schemes) (Exemption) Order 2001. Recipients may pass on this document but only to others falling within those categories.
The Renminbi Bond Fund referenced in this report is an unregulated collective investment scheme* (“UCIS”). Recipients may pass on this document but only to others falling within those categories. We confirm there are no material term side letters in place with this fund. The representative of the Fund in Switzerland is Hugo Fund Services SA, 6 Cours de Rive, 1204 Geneva. The distribution of Shares in Switzerland must exclusively be made to qualified investors. The place of performance and jurisdiction for Shares in the Fund distributed in Switzerland are at the registered office of the Representative.
*The Fund is also available in a UCITS.


Please read this important information before proceeding. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information on this site.

This website provides information about Stratton Street Capital LLP ("Stratton Street"). Stratton Street is authorised and regulated by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this website has been prepared by Stratton Street from its records and is believed to be accurate but we do not accept any liability or responsibility in respect of the information of any views expressed herein. The information, material and content provided in the pages of this website may be changed at any time by us. Information on this website may be out of date and may not be updated or removed.

The website is provided for the main purpose of providing generic information on Stratton Street and on our investment philosophy for the use of financial professionals in the United Kingdom that qualify as Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties under the rules of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"). The information in this website is not intended for the use of and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a Retail Client. Products and services referred to on this website are offered only at times when, and in jurisdictions where, they may be lawfully offered. The information on this website is not directed to any person in the United States. The provision of the information on this website does not constitute an offer to purchase securities to any person in the United States (other than a professional fiduciary acting for the account of a non-U.S person) or to any U.S. person as such term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The website is not intended to offer investors the opportunity to invest in any Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") product. The AIFs managed by Stratton Street are not being marketed in the European Economic Area ("EEA") and any eligible potential investor from the EEA who wishes to obtain information on the AIFs will only be provided with materials upon receipt by Stratton Street of an appropriate reverse solicitation request in accordance with the requirements of the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD") and national law in their home jurisdiction. By proceeding you confirm that you are not accessing this website in the context of a potential investment by an EEA investor in the AIFs managed by Stratton Street and that you have read, understood and agree to these terms.

No information contained in this website should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. The website should not be relied upon as including sufficient information to support any investment decision. If you are in doubt as to the appropriate course of action we recommend that you consult your own independent financial adviser, stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional adviser. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up. An application for any investment or service referred to on this site may only be made on the basis of the offer document, key features, prospectus or other applicable terms relating to the specific investment or service.

Where we provide hypertext links to other locations on the Internet, we do so for information purposes only. We are not responsible for the content of any other websites or pages linked to or linking to this website. We have not verified the content of any such websites. Such websites may contain products and services that are not authorised in your jurisdiction. Following links to any other websites or pages shall be at your own risk and we shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or in other way in connection with linking.

By using this site, you should be aware that we may disclose any information that we hold about you to any regulatory authority to which we are subject, or to any person legally empowered to require such information.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, by clicking the "I Accept" button below means you consent to the use of cookies on our website.