The Daily Update - Trade and Trump

Whether the actual impact of a Trump Presidency on global trade will turn out to be as negative as the campaign’s protectionist rhetoric remains unclear save that even under a better case scenario Trump is clearly looking to renegotiate the status quo. While NAFTA (with Canada and Mexico) is one agreement that he has been particularly vitriolic about, describing it as ‘probably the worst trade deal ever agreed to’, any country running a large bilateral surplus with the US could well find themselves in the firing line.

The US Treasury already releases a Semi Annual Report to Congress on the Foreign Exchange Policies of Major Trading of the US as part of a view of the exchange rate and externally-oriented policies of its major trading partners. In the October report Germany, China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Switzerland are all on a monitoring list having at least 2 of the following 3 traits: a material bilateral trade surplus with the US, a material current account or exhibiting persistent one sided foreign-exchange intervention. That said, under that review period none of the named countries exhibited all 3 traits or were considered currency manipulators. Nevertheless, this list of countries may find themselves more heavily scrutinised under a Trump administration.

China’s trading relationship with the US seems an obvious target with the Trump campaign voicing concern about currency manipulation. That said, although the renminbi has weakened against the US dollar its depreciation has been less marked against a basket of trading partners’ currencies. The US Treasury Department Review also notes ‘China’s intervention in foreign exchange markets has sought to prevent a rapid RMB depreciation that would have negative consequences for the Chinese and global economies. Treasury estimates that from August 2015 through August 2016, China sold more than $570 billion in foreign currency assets to prevent more rapid RMB depreciation.’ While it is true that China’s current account surplus reached an excessive and unsustainable level of 10 percent of GDP in 2007 it has now adjusted back to a more reasonable level in the range of 1.9-2.7 percent for 2011-2015. But as China is one of the US’s largest trading partners, and they still run a sizeable current account surplus in absolute terms, it seems this administration is likely to at the very least push for further trade rebalancing with the Treasury report highlighting the need for reforms to boost China’s domestic consumption.

But we think Germany could also find itself criticised for running large surpluses: Germany ran a current account surplus of 9.4 percent of GDP in 1H’16 and a sizeable bilateral trade surplus with the US. The US Treasury notes: ‘This surplus represents substantial excess saving’ and that ‘Some of this saving could, at least in part, be used to support German domestic demand while also reducing the current account surplus and contributing markedly to euro area and global rebalancing.’

Trump has also announced his intention to withdraw from Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed trade agreement, looking instead to ‘negotiate fair bilateral trade deals that bring jobs and industry back’. But as Olivier Blanchard, a Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the former Chief Economist at the IMF notes imposing tariffs risks decreasing growth and increasing the likelihood of a recession: ‘Tariffs by themselves may indeed reduce imports, increase the demand for domestic goods, and increase output (although, even then, as pointed out by Robert Mundell more than fifty years ago, the exchange rate may appreciate enough to lead to lower output in the end). But the "by themselves" assumption is just not right: Tariffs imposed by the United States would most likely lead to a tariff war and thus decrease exports. And the decrease in imports and exports would not be a wash. On the demand side, higher import prices would lead the Fed to increase interest rates further. On the supply side, and in my opinion more importantly, the tariffs would put into question global supply chains, disrupt production and trade, and decrease productivity.’

Interestingly, some of Trump’s key appointments have not all been hard-line protectionists: So how literally one should take some of Trump’s rhetoric remains unclear; after all he is author of the bestseller ‘The Art of the Deal’.

Please read this important information before proceeding. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information on this site.

This website provides information about Stratton Street Capital LLP ("Stratton Street"). Stratton Street is authorised and regulated by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this website has been prepared by Stratton Street from its records and is believed to be accurate but we do not accept any liability or responsibility in respect of the information of any views expressed herein. The information, material and content provided in the pages of this website may be changed at any time by us. Information on this website may be out of date and may not be updated or removed.

The website is provided for the main purpose of providing generic information on Stratton Street and on our investment philosophy for the use of financial professionals in the United Kingdom that qualify as Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties under the rules of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"). The information in this website is not intended for the use of and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a Retail Client. Products and services referred to on this website are offered only at times when, and in jurisdictions where, they may be lawfully offered. The information on this website is not directed to any person in the United States. The provision of the information on this website does not constitute an offer to purchase securities to any person in the United States (other than a professional fiduciary acting for the account of a non-U.S person) or to any U.S. person as such term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The website is not intended to offer investors the opportunity to invest in any Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") product. The AIFs managed by Stratton Street are not being marketed in the European Economic Area ("EEA") and any eligible potential investor from the EEA who wishes to obtain information on the AIFs will only be provided with materials upon receipt by Stratton Street of an appropriate reverse solicitation request in accordance with the requirements of the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD") and national law in their home jurisdiction. By proceeding you confirm that you are not accessing this website in the context of a potential investment by an EEA investor in the AIFs managed by Stratton Street and that you have read, understood and agree to these terms.

No information contained in this website should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. The website should not be relied upon as including sufficient information to support any investment decision. If you are in doubt as to the appropriate course of action we recommend that you consult your own independent financial adviser, stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional adviser. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up. An application for any investment or service referred to on this site may only be made on the basis of the offer document, key features, prospectus or other applicable terms relating to the specific investment or service.

Where we provide hypertext links to other locations on the Internet, we do so for information purposes only. We are not responsible for the content of any other websites or pages linked to or linking to this website. We have not verified the content of any such websites. Such websites may contain products and services that are not authorised in your jurisdiction. Following links to any other websites or pages shall be at your own risk and we shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or in other way in connection with linking.

By using this site, you should be aware that we may disclose any information that we hold about you to any regulatory authority to which we are subject, or to any person legally empowered to require such information.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, by clicking the "I Accept" button below means you consent to the use of cookies on our website.