The Daily Update - Brexit and Bruegel

It is now close to ten weeks since the vote for Brexit. Interestingly, the economy is holding up better than the doomsday scenarios projected, in the short-term at least. The August manufacturing PMI showed one of the strongest monthly gains in 25 years rising 5.1 points to a reading of 53.5; this suggests UK manufacturing has benefited from the fall in sterling since the vote on June 23. The recent house price data has also proven robust so far rising 5.6% yoy in August, although we note the more bearish will point to a weakening in mortgage approvals. All this has given sterling a bit of a reprieve but it is still trading over 10% weaker against the US dollar and over 9.5% weaker against the euro. Whether this better than expected growth scenario is sustainable is still up for debate as the impact on investment is still an unknown. But with a strong legal framework and a skilled workforce investment may be more resilient than is feared, particularly as the UK Treasury seems to favour cutting taxes: Apple’s €13bn EU fine for tax avoidance suggests Europe is moving in the opposite direction.

What form ‘Brexit means Brexit’ will eventually takes remains unclear. The negotiation is going to be complicated with the potential for fireworks along the way on concerns about Britain wanting to ‘cherry pick’ terms and issues such as the UK cutting corporate tax. In March 2016 George Osborne legislated to lower corporation tax to 17% by 2020 and then post the referendum said is should be further lowered, and the new Chancellor Philip Hammond is expected to clarify the strategy towards the end of the year.

The Bruegel Institute, a highly regarded economic think tank, released a report on 29 August, written by Jean Pisani Ferry et al. in which they suggest that none of the existing arrangements are likely to work for the UK and recommend thinking along the lines of a continental partnership: ‘a new proposal for the EU-UK relationship that is considerably less deep than EU membership but rather closer than a simple free-trade agreement.’ This could provide a possible basis for relationships with other countries giving Europe a supranational euro core area and an outer circle with a structured intergovernmental partnership. They argue ‘Without a common vision of their shared future over the longer term, the UK and the EU risk being dragged into unprincipled bargaining and, albeit in slow motion, weakening their positions in the wider world.’

Given the geographical proximity and that Britain has already been part of the EU since 1973 there is already a high degree of interconnection and communality of interests. The Bruegel paper argues that Europe is a supranational political project but the UK has clearly rejected this vision and one of the principal elements: the freedom of movement. They see the best way forward is to create a framework for close cooperation but also one that has some limits on labour mobility under the creation of a ‘Continental Partnership’ (CP). It aims to keep functional integration in the sense of a deeply integrated market with an absence of tariffs, common rules and standards, common enforcement and competition in conjunction with common budget contributions. They also envisage ‘close cooperation on foreign policy, security and possibly, defence matters.’ This falls short of the economic-political constitution under the Treaty of Rome with the four freedoms; in this case allowing only limited ‘temporary labour mobility’ rather than completely free movement. They suggest a workable structure as one where there is a CP council to input, negotiate and discuss draft regulation and policies but lawmaking would still run through the EU channels: in effect ‘a political – not legal – commitment by EU member states to take into account the positions and deliberations in the CP council.’

Under this arrangement the UK could still access the market and limit immigration but would pay the price of less political influence and contributing to the budget in return for market access. For the EU this relationship could create a more effective model using the community method and at the same time increasing political stability and legitimacy. It could could be used for membership beyond the UK; for example, it could be applied to Turkey in the future where the Bruegel paper notes ‘Arguably, one of the reasons why some EU member states would never accept Turkey joining the EU is free movement.’

In the aftermath of Brexit this sort of arrangement may at first seem inconceivable but the situation is a bit of a prisoner’s dilemma in that both parties stand to lose by taking a hard-line approach.

Please read this important information before proceeding. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information on this site.

This website provides information about Stratton Street Capital LLP ("Stratton Street"). Stratton Street is authorised and regulated by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this website has been prepared by Stratton Street from its records and is believed to be accurate but we do not accept any liability or responsibility in respect of the information of any views expressed herein. The information, material and content provided in the pages of this website may be changed at any time by us. Information on this website may be out of date and may not be updated or removed.

The website is provided for the main purpose of providing generic information on Stratton Street and on our investment philosophy for the use of financial professionals in the United Kingdom that qualify as Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties under the rules of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"). The information in this website is not intended for the use of and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a Retail Client. Products and services referred to on this website are offered only at times when, and in jurisdictions where, they may be lawfully offered. The information on this website is not directed to any person in the United States. The provision of the information on this website does not constitute an offer to purchase securities to any person in the United States (other than a professional fiduciary acting for the account of a non-U.S person) or to any U.S. person as such term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The website is not intended to offer investors the opportunity to invest in any Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") product. The AIFs managed by Stratton Street are not being marketed in the European Economic Area ("EEA") and any eligible potential investor from the EEA who wishes to obtain information on the AIFs will only be provided with materials upon receipt by Stratton Street of an appropriate reverse solicitation request in accordance with the requirements of the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD") and national law in their home jurisdiction. By proceeding you confirm that you are not accessing this website in the context of a potential investment by an EEA investor in the AIFs managed by Stratton Street and that you have read, understood and agree to these terms.

No information contained in this website should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. The website should not be relied upon as including sufficient information to support any investment decision. If you are in doubt as to the appropriate course of action we recommend that you consult your own independent financial adviser, stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional adviser. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up. An application for any investment or service referred to on this site may only be made on the basis of the offer document, key features, prospectus or other applicable terms relating to the specific investment or service.

Where we provide hypertext links to other locations on the Internet, we do so for information purposes only. We are not responsible for the content of any other websites or pages linked to or linking to this website. We have not verified the content of any such websites. Such websites may contain products and services that are not authorised in your jurisdiction. Following links to any other websites or pages shall be at your own risk and we shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or in other way in connection with linking.

By using this site, you should be aware that we may disclose any information that we hold about you to any regulatory authority to which we are subject, or to any person legally empowered to require such information.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, by clicking the "I Accept" button below means you consent to the use of cookies on our website.