The Daily Update - NAFTA / Sugar / UK elections

The U.S. and Mexico look to have averted a trade crisis with a preliminary agreement earlier this week that staves off import tariffs (as high as 80%) on Mexican sugar. Although the deal looks to clear the way of a contentious issue between the two governments before the upcoming NAFTA talks, it may provide confidence that those talks will find some middle ground on a range of issues.

With NAFTA coming into effect in 1994, America’s sugar producers were protected from Mexican imports through small yearly quotas. However, in 2006 both sides signed a memorandum of understanding to establish free trade on sweeteners within 24 months. However with years of record harvest in both Mexico and the US there were calls in early 2014 from the US sugar producers to instigate anti-subsidy and anti-dumping tariffs on Mexican imports. The two sides later that year reached an agreement on restrictions to Mexican sugar imports in exchange for dropping the investigations into the dumping policies.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross seemed pleased with the outcome stating that ‘The Mexican side has agreed to nearly every request by the U.S. industry to address flaws in the current system and to ensure fair treatment of American sugar growers’. Although the draft agreement still does need some fine tuning according to U.S. sugar producers who claim in its current form the agreement leaves open a loophole that would allow Mexican exports to continue to dump subsidised sugar on the U.S. market. American Sugar Alliance spokesman Phillip Hayes said ‘We will work with Secretary Ross in the coming days to see if that loophole can be effectively closed so that the basic provisions of the agreement are not undermined and USDA can effectively manage the sugar program’. When Ross was pressed on how long it may take to get the U.S. sugar industry on board he was hopeful ‘It should be days, not weeks or months’ to get a final draft signed off.

And of course we have the UK election today where it has been pointed out that the UK could return to a two-party state. The combined polling of the Conservatives and Labour is around 80%. In the last 3 elections the highest combined total of the two major parties was below 70%, and the last 11 elections only once (1979, when Margaret Thatcher beat James Callaghan with a parliamentary majority of 43 seats) when it was just shy of 81%. This trend is the opposite of what has been seen in most of the developed world; however the UK has maybe addressed anti-establishment politics earlier than other countries with the Brexit vote. UKIP had been calling for the vote for years and the movement for a democratic vote on our relationship with Europe was growing almost daily. However now we have had the vote, the people have spoken, UKIP now no longer really serves a purpose, one of the main reasons we could potentially return to a two- party state, and the fact that the Liberal Democrat Party want a second vote on the Brexit deal. However it seems that a large part of the UK population has accepted the Brexit vote and are keen on moving on. And the outcome?? Well the polls have varied massively but none has a Labour victory, and Sporting Index is making 75–87 (at time of writing) on the size of the Conservatives seat majority.

Please read this important information before proceeding. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information on this site.

This website provides information about Stratton Street Capital LLP ("Stratton Street"). Stratton Street is authorised and regulated by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this website has been prepared by Stratton Street from its records and is believed to be accurate but we do not accept any liability or responsibility in respect of the information of any views expressed herein. The information, material and content provided in the pages of this website may be changed at any time by us. Information on this website may be out of date and may not be updated or removed.

The website is provided for the main purpose of providing generic information on Stratton Street and on our investment philosophy for the use of financial professionals in the United Kingdom that qualify as Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties under the rules of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"). The information in this website is not intended for the use of and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a Retail Client. Products and services referred to on this website are offered only at times when, and in jurisdictions where, they may be lawfully offered. The information on this website is not directed to any person in the United States. The provision of the information on this website does not constitute an offer to purchase securities to any person in the United States (other than a professional fiduciary acting for the account of a non-U.S person) or to any U.S. person as such term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The website is not intended to offer investors the opportunity to invest in any Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") product. The AIFs managed by Stratton Street are not being marketed in the European Economic Area ("EEA") and any eligible potential investor from the EEA who wishes to obtain information on the AIFs will only be provided with materials upon receipt by Stratton Street of an appropriate reverse solicitation request in accordance with the requirements of the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD") and national law in their home jurisdiction. By proceeding you confirm that you are not accessing this website in the context of a potential investment by an EEA investor in the AIFs managed by Stratton Street and that you have read, understood and agree to these terms.

No information contained in this website should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. The website should not be relied upon as including sufficient information to support any investment decision. If you are in doubt as to the appropriate course of action we recommend that you consult your own independent financial adviser, stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional adviser. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up. An application for any investment or service referred to on this site may only be made on the basis of the offer document, key features, prospectus or other applicable terms relating to the specific investment or service.

Where we provide hypertext links to other locations on the Internet, we do so for information purposes only. We are not responsible for the content of any other websites or pages linked to or linking to this website. We have not verified the content of any such websites. Such websites may contain products and services that are not authorised in your jurisdiction. Following links to any other websites or pages shall be at your own risk and we shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or in other way in connection with linking.

By using this site, you should be aware that we may disclose any information that we hold about you to any regulatory authority to which we are subject, or to any person legally empowered to require such information.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, by clicking the "I Accept" button below means you consent to the use of cookies on our website.