The Daily Update - Budget, tax reform and Apple

Congress should shortly pass a bill to temporarily circumvent the debt ceiling. Subsequently, they will deal with the budget, which is very likely to be late. Tax reform, like the repeal of Obamacare, is much too complicated to get done anytime soon, so the budget could be in limbo for the rest of the year. Or Congress would have to pass something that did not incorporate tax reform. The problem is that the Republicans, despite having control of Congress for many years, currently have no viable plans either for health care or tax reform.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released a report in July that does not expect the President’s Budget to achieve a surplus in the next 10 years, yet the President’s Budget is aiming to reach a balance by 2027. Nearly all of the difference stems from the revenue assumptions: the CBO include lower economic growth expectations reflecting a lack of policy detail (e.g. tax reform) which means they incorporate less for macroeconomic feedback effects and fiscal multipliers. According to CBO estimates, Trump’s proposals will generate an extra 0.1% of growth per annum over the 2018-2027 period when the Trump Administration is talking of an additional 1%. Already one can see that there are a lot of moot points.

Trump has spoken of a 15 percent target for the US corporate tax rate and the scope to make the US tax system more efficient and competitive. While removing inefficiencies and lowering the overall tax rate seems desirable the issue is complicated and not helped by numerous loopholes. The Congressional Budget Office noted in a March 2017 comparison of corporate tax rates for 2012: using the top rate of statutory tax the US is the highest among the G20 nations at 39.1% (including state taxes). When they looked at the average corporate tax rate (corporate tax as a percentage of income) the US at 29% is third highest amongst the G20. Using their estimate the effective marginal corporate tax rate is 18.6% (the tax burden on returns from marginal investment) and the fourth highest rate among the G20.  Nevertheless, the ranking does suggest there is scope for improvement; but as the Congressional Research Service notes ‘The statutory rate differential is relevant for international profit shifting; effective rates are more relevant for firms’ investment levels.’

Trump is keen to address the repatriation of international profits which face a tax rate of 39.1% (Federal and State taxes) less any tax credits for taxes already paid overseas: ‘By making it less punitive for companies to bring back this money, and by making the process far less bureaucratic and difficult, we can return trillions and trillions of dollars to our economy and spur billions of dollars in new investments in our struggling communities and throughout our nation.’ Estimates vary about the actual size of the cash pool US corporates are holding offshore.  For example, Moody’s estimate that at the end of 2016 USD1.84tn of cash was held by US non-financial corporates and USD1.3bn was held overseas. Trump has talked of a much larger figure, ‘anywhere between $3tn to $5tn’, but the White House cites a figure of USD2.6tn for Fortune 500 companies holding profits offshore.

Apple perhaps epitomises some of the inefficiencies the US tax system is creating.  Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, is reported as saying ‘The issue is not that there's a tax on international earnings. The issue is the existing tax has been crazy,’ and that ‘No one would bring it back at a 40 percent—I mean, 35 percent federal and then state taxes. That's the problem. I think it's smart for the United States to have some kind of tax revenue for international earnings—if that tax were reasonable.’ S&P estimated that Apple had USD17bn of domestic cash at the end of the second quarter and expect it to continue to tap debt markets while there are no reforms making it more attractive to repatriate overseas cash. S&P estimates the total net cash position of Apple was much higher at USD158bn.

Unsurprisingly, Apple returned to the debt markets this week with a USD5bn bond issue at 2, 5, 10 and 30 year maturities to finance its share buyback program and fund dividend payments. On a positive note, these inefficiencies in the tax system are creating some good opportunities for us to gain exposure to corporate credits. Apple is rated Aa1/AA+ by Moody’s and S&P and some of the existing issues screen attractively on our models. For example, Apple 3.85% 2043 is a liquid USD3bn issue and trades 4 credit notches cheap on our models.

Please read this important information before proceeding. It contains legal and regulatory notices relevant to the information on this site.

This website provides information about Stratton Street Capital LLP ("Stratton Street"). Stratton Street is authorised and regulated by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this website has been prepared by Stratton Street from its records and is believed to be accurate but we do not accept any liability or responsibility in respect of the information of any views expressed herein. The information, material and content provided in the pages of this website may be changed at any time by us. Information on this website may be out of date and may not be updated or removed.

The website is provided for the main purpose of providing generic information on Stratton Street and on our investment philosophy for the use of financial professionals in the United Kingdom that qualify as Professional Clients or Eligible Counterparties under the rules of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"). The information in this website is not intended for the use of and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a Retail Client. Products and services referred to on this website are offered only at times when, and in jurisdictions where, they may be lawfully offered. The information on this website is not directed to any person in the United States. The provision of the information on this website does not constitute an offer to purchase securities to any person in the United States (other than a professional fiduciary acting for the account of a non-U.S person) or to any U.S. person as such term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The website is not intended to offer investors the opportunity to invest in any Alternative Investment Fund ("AIF") product. The AIFs managed by Stratton Street are not being marketed in the European Economic Area ("EEA") and any eligible potential investor from the EEA who wishes to obtain information on the AIFs will only be provided with materials upon receipt by Stratton Street of an appropriate reverse solicitation request in accordance with the requirements of the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD") and national law in their home jurisdiction. By proceeding you confirm that you are not accessing this website in the context of a potential investment by an EEA investor in the AIFs managed by Stratton Street and that you have read, understood and agree to these terms.

No information contained in this website should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. The website should not be relied upon as including sufficient information to support any investment decision. If you are in doubt as to the appropriate course of action we recommend that you consult your own independent financial adviser, stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional adviser. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up. An application for any investment or service referred to on this site may only be made on the basis of the offer document, key features, prospectus or other applicable terms relating to the specific investment or service.

Where we provide hypertext links to other locations on the Internet, we do so for information purposes only. We are not responsible for the content of any other websites or pages linked to or linking to this website. We have not verified the content of any such websites. Such websites may contain products and services that are not authorised in your jurisdiction. Following links to any other websites or pages shall be at your own risk and we shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or in other way in connection with linking.

By using this site, you should be aware that we may disclose any information that we hold about you to any regulatory authority to which we are subject, or to any person legally empowered to require such information.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, by clicking the "I Accept" button below means you consent to the use of cookies on our website.